Today's Date: April 26, 2024
National Animation Museum Announces Collaboration with The Children's Museum of Indianapolis   •   Vantage unveils significant impact of donation on UNHCR's ongoing refugee support in Australia   •   FanttikRide Unveils Officially Licensed Mercedes Benz AMG G63 Miniature Car for Kids   •   New Research from Material and NewtonX Reveals Shifts in Digital Ad Spending and Social Media Strategies   •   AACN’s New Web Resource Focuses on Preparing Nurses with Essential Well-Being and Leadership Competencies   •   AGNICO EAGLE REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2024 RESULTS - STRONG QUARTERLY GOLD PRODUCTION AND COST PERFORMANCE DRIVE RECORD QUARTERLY F   •   Conservation International Honors Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez with its Global Visionary Award   •   Babcock & Wilcox Sets First Quarter 2024 Conference Call and Webcast for Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 5 p.m. ET   •   Statement by the First Nations Leadership Council and Ministers Hajdu and Anandasangaree following their participation at Our Ga   •   Yeshiva University Launches Accelerated Transfer Initiative for Students Who Feel Threatened at Current Universities   •   AHF Praises Colombia for Putting Lives Before Pharma Greed   •   Hyosung TNC presents a new paradigm through sustainable bio BDO production.   •   Snap Inc. Announces First Quarter 2024 Financial Results   •   Metro Storage LLC Invests in Sustainable Future with Rooftop Solar Energy Panels   •   Bethlehem Lecturer Sees Naked Public Square Grown Cold   •   PharMerica Donates 719,287 Prescriptions to Underserved Patients in 2023   •   Lucidea Press Releases New Museum CMS Title Demystifying Data Preparation   •   OPAL Fuels Announces First Quarter 2024 Earnings Release Date and Conference Call   •   KB Home Announces the Grand Opening of Its Newest Community Within the Highly Desirable Stanford Crossing Master Plan in Lathrop   •   Freeport-McMoRan Publishes 2023 Annual Report on Sustainability
Bookmark and Share

Feds Must Justify Withholding Black Panther Docs

WASHINGTON -- Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that a federal court rejected a claim of the attorney work product doctrine by the Department of Justice (DOJ) for documents prepared after the government dismissed its case against the New Black Panther Party for Self Defense on May 15, 2009.

Black Panther
DOJ
Department of Justice
Black News, African American News, Minority News, Civil Rights News, Discrimination, Racism, Racial Equality, Bias, Equality, Afro American NewsThe DOJ also ordered the agency to provide better justification for withholding those documents related to the aftermath of its decision to drop its complaint against several members of the New Black Panther Party who were accused of engaging in voter intimidation during the 2008 presidential campaign.

The ruling came in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, No. 10-851(RBW).

In his August 4, 2011, decision, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton rejected the Obama Justice Department's arguments that documents prepared after the government dismissed its case (against the New Black Panther Party on May 15, 2009) could be withheld under the "attorney work product privilege" exemption.

Judge Walton explained, "Although an injunction remains in place in the New Black Panther Party case…the filing of the motion for voluntary dismissal largely marked the end of the litigation. As such, the documents prepared subsequent to that event were not prepared in contemplation of litigation and are thus outside the scope of the work-product privilege."

Because the case had essentially ended on May 15, 2009, Judge Walton found that "it is difficult to see how" the 24 documents created after May 15, 2009, "were prepared or obtained because of the prospect of litigation, which is the testing question the Court must answer in evaluating the DOJ's work-product claim."

Although Judge Walton found that the DOJ improperly withheld the 24 documents under the attorney work product doctrine, Judge Walton concluded that the documents were properly withheld under the deliberative process privilege, an entirely discretionary claim of exemption.

Judge Walton also found that the DOJ failed to satisfy its burden of showing that the 24 documents may be withheld in their entirety. Under the deliberative process privilege, the DOJ may only withhold information that is "predecisional and deliberative."

Judge Walton explained, "As it stands now, the description of the DOJ's segregation efforts is too general for the Court, and the plaintiff, to evaluate whether any factual material in these documents is 'inextricably intertwined' with the deliberative material and would thus permit the DOJ to withhold the documents in their entirety."

Therefore, Judge Walton provided the DOJ a second chance to satisfy its burden by submitting "a renewed motion for summary judgment accompanied by a declaration or other documentation that solely addresses the segregability issue."

If the DOJ fails to "provide adequate detail regarding why these documents cannot be segregated, the DOJ will be required to disclose the non-exempt portions to the plaintiff."
DOJ's renewed motion for summary judgment is due September 30, 2011. Judge Walton hopes to rule by February 3, 2012.

According to a Justice Department document previously produced to Judicial Watch, top political appointees at the DOJ were involved in the decision to dismiss its voting rights case against the New Black Panther Party, including Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, the third highest ranking official at the Obama Justice Department.

Attorney General Eric Holder also received "an update on a planned course of action in the NBPP" from Acting Assistant Attorney General Loretta King, dated May 12, 2009, just three days before the case was dismissed, according to a Vaughn index uncovered by Judicial Watch. A Vaughnindex describes documents being withheld from disclosure under FOIA and the basis for the withholdings.

Previous documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, which include descriptions of internal DOJ email correspondence, directly contradict sworn testimony by Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, who testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that no political leadership was involved in the decision.

"The Obama Justice Department is going to extraordinary lengths to make sure no more details emerge regarding the Black Panther scandal," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "We already know the Obama administration's claim that political appointees were not involved in this decision is patently false. And now Justice Department officials continue to fight tooth and nail to stonewall the release of additional information. What else do they have to hide? This new court ruling means we may pry loose some additional information on this voter intimidation scandal."  


STORY TAGS: Black Panther , DOJ , Department of Justice , Black News, African American News, Minority News, Civil Rights News, Discrimination, Racism, Racial Equality, Bias, Equality, Afro American News

Video

White House Live Stream
LIVE VIDEO EVERY SATURDAY
alsharpton Rev. Al Sharpton
9 to 11 am EST
jjackson Rev. Jesse Jackson
10 to noon CST


Video

LIVE BROADCASTS
Sounds Make the News ®
WAOK-Urban
Atlanta - WAOK-Urban
KPFA-Progressive
Berkley / San Francisco - KPFA-Progressive
WVON-Urban
Chicago - WVON-Urban
KJLH - Urban
Los Angeles - KJLH - Urban
WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
WADO-Spanish
New York - WADO-Spanish
WBAI - Progressive
New York - WBAI - Progressive
WOL-Urban
Washington - WOL-Urban

Listen to United Natiosns News