Your unfiltered news center. ®

The world you see depends upon the news you get. ®

Today's Date: April 30, 2024

21st Annual CONSEF draws in hundreds of students • Fitch Ratings Upgrades Cemex to Investment Grade • Microvast Schedules First Quarter Earnings Call • CER issues final authorization for Trans Mountain Expansion Project to operate • Belkin Commits to be 100 Percent Carbon Neutral Across Its Entire Business by 2030 • Itron Enhances Temetra® Platform to Maximize Business Value for Water Utilities in Australia and New Zealand • Red, Flight and Blue: A4A Launches Campaign Highlighting Airline Benefits for Servicemembers • Statement - Federal government concerned about further delays in release of Quebec government's caribou strategy • Docebo Announces Participation in Upcoming Investor Conferences in May • YVR and Pacific Autism Family Network Reimagine Travel for Neurodiverse Families • University of Phoenix Launches Student and Alumni Leadership Council • Empower Change: Support Pediatric Feeding Disorder Awareness Month with Feeding Matters this May • Argonne, Toyota Collaborate on Cutting-Edge Battery Recycling Process • Think Together Pivots Annual Gala to Hold Donor-Driven Curriculum Kit Build Event • Rev. Al Sharpton Demands Diversity on Delaware’s Chancery Court • 13 Caps and Counting, the Maplewood at Strawberry Hill Community Honors its Own • On to Release First Quarter 2024 Results on Tuesday, May 14, 2024 • GMI Achieves SOC 2 Type 2 Attestation, Reinforcing Its Commitment to Security, Confidentiality, and Availability • Belkin Commits to be 100 Percent Carbon Neutral Across Its Entire Business by 2030 • National Council for Reconciliation Act becomes law, a positive step toward fulfilling Calls to Action from the Truth and Reconc

NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY DISPUTE SURFACES AMONG FEDS

September 30 letter from Chairman Reynolds to Attorney General Holder regarding the Commission’s ongoing review of the New Black Panther Party case. The letter asks the Attorney General to “instruct Department officials to fully cooperate” with the Commission’s information requests.

UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

624 NINTH STREET,NW,WASHINGTON, DC20425 www.usccr.gov

September 30, 2009

The Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Attorney General

U.S. Department of Justice

Washington, DC 20530

Re: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Review and Report on the Implications of

Enforcement Actions in United States v. New Black Panther Party for Self-

Defense, Civ. No. 09-0065 SD (E.D. Pa.) (NBPP case)

Dear Attorney General Holder:

The Commission requests that you instruct Department officials to fully cooperate, as 42

U.S.C. § 1975b(e) requires, with our overdue information requests in the above-referenced

matter. To that end, we also ask you to identify an individual who will exercise the substantive

authority to coordinate the Department’s responses to our current and future requests.

Pursuant to formal proceedings, the Commission initiated an inquiry into the implications

of the Department’s enforcement actions in the NBPP case as reflected in our letters to DOJ of

June 16 and 22. We received a largely non-responsive letter from Portia Roberson in late July

and none of the documents we requested. On August 7, the Commission voted 6-0, with two

members abstaining, to expand its investigation by sending a follow-up letter to the Department.

On August 10, the Commission addressed its letter to you, explaining our need for the

information. For example, we stressed our need for information on previous voter intimidation

investigations so that we could determine whether the Department’s action in the NBPP case

constitutes a change in policy and, if so, what the implications of that change might be.

At our most recent meeting on September 11, 2009, the Commission voted to make its

review of the implications of the NBPP matter the subject of its annual enforcement report. The

Commission was aware that the Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had

initiated an inquiry into some aspects of the NBPP case to determine whether further review is

warranted. Although a letter from Ms. Roberson of September 9 expresses the Department’s

desire to delay any response to the Commission until the OPR investigation is complete, you

may rest assured that the Commission will be sensitive to OPR’s internal ethics review as we

move forward with our own inquiry. As the discussion at our recent meeting indicates, the

Commission will work to accommodate any legitimate concerns the Department may have

regarding specific requests for information once the Department begins its production.

The Commission has a special statutory responsibility to investigate voting rights

deprivations and make appraisals of federal policies to enforce federal voting rights laws. The

Commission must form an independent judgment regarding the merits of the NBPP enforcement

actions (regardless of how the decisions were made) and the potential impact on future voterintimidation

enforcement by the Department. Accordingly, Congress has provided, in a

provision with no statutory exceptions, that, “All Federal agencies shall fully cooperate with the

Commission to the end that it may effectively carry out its functions and duties.” 42 U.S.C.

§ 1975b(e).

It is important to note that many aspects of the Commission’s inquiry have no connection

with the matters subject to OPR’s jurisdiction. As set forth in our August 10 letter, the

Commission will seek to determine:

1) the facts and the Department’s actions regarding prior voting intimidation investigations;

2) the underlying conduct in Philadelphia giving rise to the NBPP case;

3) whether the decision in the NBPP case is consistent with departmental policy or practice in

prior cases or amounts to a change in policy or practice;

4) the extent to which current policy or practice as reflected in the NBPP case may encourage

voter intimidation; and

5) whether that policy or practice is consistent with proper enforcement of section 11(b) of the

Voting Rights Act.

The Commission may also seek to determine whether any decisions in the case were

induced or affected by improper influences. Thus, there may be some areas of potential overlap

with OPR’s internal review, including an examination of the decision-making process in the

case. With regard to these questions, if there are concerns as to the timing or content of specific

discovery requests, the Commission will work with the Department to resolve them in a prompt

and satisfactory manner. In addition to my personal availability to speak with your

representatives, the Commission has appointed a subcommittee of commissioners to focus on

any discovery issue that might arise in our investigation.

Accordingly, please identify the individual with substantive responsibility for the

production of documents, scheduling of interviews and any possible depositions. If you have not

done so by October 14th, however, it will be necessary for us to propound our interrogatories and

interview requests directly on the affected Department personnel.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and prompt reply to these requests.

Sincerely,

Gerald A. Reynolds

Chairman

LIVE VIDEO EVERY SATURDAY

Rev. Al Sharpton
9 to 11 am EST

Rev. Jesse Jackson
10 to noon CST

LIVE BROADCASTS

Sounds Make the News ®

Atlanta - WAOK-Urban

Berkley / San Francisco - KPFA-Progressive

Chicago - WVON-Urban

Los Angeles - KJLH - Urban

New York - WKDM-Mandarin Chinese

New York - WADO-Spanish

New York - WBAI - Progressive

Washington - WOL-Urban